 |
| What do you get when you cross a sea serpent with a jalapeno relleno? (Photo credit: garlandcannon) |
 |
| Chopera castellana (Danielmabe) (Photo credit: Nicolas Moulin (Nimou)) |
 |
| Radical cheerleaders at a climate-change action. (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
 |
| Protesters prepare for a photo on World Environment Day at a log dump in the Central Highlands, Victoria, Australia. (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
 |
| This was taken during the Climate Change Camp 2007 at Heathrow Airport in London. (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
 |
| Department of Energy and Climate Change (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
 |
| So Climate Change Conference (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
I started my usual copy and paste - CtrlC > Ctrl V - in Google Chrome instead of Firefox. The tooltip picks up excess formatting for my purposes...and the results are obvious below.
STEVE MALEY: Climate Change, Climate Skeptics And Climate Fools
Red State
I'm a conservative engineer, but I'm an engineer first. IF someone could show me real proof, I would accept AGW theory. There are two things that might convince me that there actually is a runaway greenhouse mechanism at work; show me proof of upper-atmosphere warming higher than surface warming (the signature of a runaway greenhouse mechanism) or show me a set of computer projections that actually work (along with source code and input datasets)
After decades and millions (billions?) of dollars, the climate alarmists have yet to produce either one of those things, which means all they have is an intriguing (and, in my opinion, ridiculous) theory.
On top of that, they don't act like scientists who have the truth on thier side; they engage in ad-hominim smears, they game the peer review process, they hide thier source data, and they outright fudge results in order to get the political results they want. For all of the conspiracy talk among the left, I have yet to hear of ANY such activities coming from the skeptics.
.......................................
John Farnham · Top Commenter
Next 93 nailed it in comments. 'Green' pundits have no regard for accuracy when quoting their own sources, let alone those of others. The list posted at Grist of arguments against 'climate deniers' is a classic case of talking 'opposing views' while ignoring the reality of being confounded by the size of the task, oversimplification of modelling, omission of processes, ignorance and ignoring of background natural cycles....etc. This is not a 'scientific' discussion at all - but Chicken Little taxes the world.
Antarctic crossing: Do or die
Adventurer Sir Ranulph Fiennes says his bid for the world's first Antarctic winter crossing, with no option of rescue, is a trip into the unknown...
MEME GIRLS: The sorry trend of 's--- shaming'
THERE'S some serious girl-on-girl crime happening all over the internet - as women ridicule one another in cruel memes on Tumblr and Facebook.
Read more: http://www.news.com.au/technology/mean-girls-the-sorry-trend-of-s-shaming/story-e6frfro0-1226548745224#ixzz2HFeN7XhC
U.S. dismisses Assad speech, says he must step aside
The U.S. State Department dismissed a speech by Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in Damascus on Sunday as a meaningless attempt to retain power in...
In Caldwell County hamlet, homeowner fights over water fees
Carol Wester knows just about everyone in this rural hamlet 10 miles southeast of San ...
Fructose is appetite-boosting - PR
Contact: Helen Dodsonhelen.dodson@yale.edu303-436-3984JAMA and Archives Journals Imaging study examines effect of fructose on brain regions...
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment