Fair Use Note

WARNING for European visitors: European Union laws require you to give European Union visitors information about cookies used on your blog. In many cases, these laws also require you to obtain consent. As a courtesy, we have added a notice on your blog to explain Google's use of certain Blogger and Google cookies, including use of Google Analytics and AdSense cookies. You are responsible for confirming this notice actually works for your blog, and that it displays. If you employ other cookies, for example by adding third party features, this notice may not work for you. Learn more about this notice and your responsibilities.

Thomas Paine

To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead.

Sunday, November 8, 2009

The Seeds of Global Slavery...and Human Extinction





Since 1970 multinational companies have bought or taken control of nearly a thousand, once independent, seed companies. The purchase of Pioneer Hi-Bred in 1999, the world's largest seed company, for $7.7 billion by Du-Pont, is part of a trend of concentration of power in the life sciences industry. The $23 billion global seed trade is now dominated by a handful of giant corporations.

A survey by anti-trust officials at the EEC revealed returns on sales of seeds of 40-45%. Commercial breeders inevitably target their products at affluent farmers with the most favourable growing conditions. The development of new crop varieties is determined by the agenda of corporate profit and not the needs of growers, consumers or the environment.



Hybridisation

The commercial agricultural seed market began with the development of hybrids. Prior to World War I the seed trade consisted of merchants of exotic plant seed collected from the colonised world. Farmers were persuaded to buy hybrid seed because of its high yield. As seeds collected from hybrid crops loose their vigour, farmers were forced to purchase new ones each season.
.

Patents

Multinational corporations have succeeded in gaining patent rights over new crop varieties. In 1970 the U.S. Plant Variety Protection Act was passed. Plant protection regimes offered opportunities for profit and created the incentive for corporate interests to buy control of the seed industry. Thousands of patents have been granted on plants. Indigenous plants that have been used for centuries have been patented, this practice has been termed biopiracy. Commenting on the international property (TRIPS) of GATT which will enforce patents and intellectual property rights internationally, James Enyart of Monsanto stated "Industry has identified a major problem in international trade. It crafted a solution, and sold it to our own and other governments".
Reliance on chemical inputs
Chemical fertilisers are needed for the increased energy demands of the modern varieties. Rows of uniform crops grown in the monocultures present any easy target to pests. Pesticides are relyed upon to compensate for lack of resistance to pests.











A survey by anti-trust officials at the EEC revealed returns on sales of seeds of 40-45%. Commercial breeders inevitably target their products at affluent farmers with the most favourable growing conditions. The development of new crop varieties is determined by the agenda of corporate profit and not the needs of growers, consumers or the environment.






MONSANTO BUYS 'TERMINATOR' SEEDS COMPANY

The United States Government has been financing research on a genetic engineering technology which, when commercialized, will give its owners the power to control the food seed of entire nations or regions. The Government has been working quietly on this technology since 1983. Now, the little-known company that has been working in this genetic research with the Government’s US Department of Agriculture-- Delta & Pine Land-- is about to become part of the world’s largest supplier of patented genetically-modified seeds (GMO), Monsanto Corporation of St. Louis, Missouri.
Relations between Monsanto, Delta & Pine Land and the USDA, on closer scrutiny, show the deep and dark side of the much-heralded genetic revolution in agriculture. It proves deep-held suspicions that the Gene Revolution is not about ‘solving the world hunger problem’ as its advocates claim. It’s about handing over control of the seeds for mankind’s basic food supply—rice, corn, soybeans, wheat, even fruit, vegetables and cotton—to privately owned corporations. Once the seeds and their use are patented and controlled by one or several private agribusiness multinationals, it will be they who can decide whether or not a particular customer—let’s say for argument, China or Brazil or India or Japan—whether they will or won’t get the patented seeds from Monsanto, or from one of its licensee GMO partners like Bayer Crop Sciences, Syngenta or DuPont’s Pioneer Hi-Bred International. 
While most of us don’t bother to reflect on where the corn in the box of Kellogg’s Corn Flakes or the rice in a box of Uncle Ben’s Converted Rice come from, when we grab it from the supermarket shelf, they all must originate with seeds. Seeds can either be taken by a farmer from the previous season’ seeds, and planted to produce the next harvest. Or, seeds can be bought new each harvest season, from the companies which sell their seeds. 
The advent of commercial GMO seeds in the early 1990’s allowed companies like Monsanto, DuPont or Dow Chemicals to go from supplying agriculture chemical herbicides like Roundup, to patenting genetically altered seeds for basic farm crops like corn, rice, soybeans or wheat. For almost a quarter century, since 1983, the US Government has quietly been working to perfect a genetically engineered technique whereby farmers would be forced to turn to their seed supplier each harvest to get new seeds. The seeds would only produce one harvest. After that the seeds from that harvest would commit ‘suicide’ and be unusable. 
There has been much hue and cry, correctly so, that this process, patented ‘suicide’ seeds, officially termed GURTs (Genetic Use Restriction Technologies), is a threat to poor farmers in developing countries like India or Brazil, who traditionally save their own seeds for the next planting. In fact, GURTs, more popularly referred to as Terminator seeds for the brutal manner in which they kill off plant reproduction possibilities, is a threat to the food security as well of North America, Western Europe, Japan and anywhere Monsanto and its elite cartel of GMO agribusiness partners enters a market.


‘One application of the technology could be to control unauthorized planting of seed of proprietary varieties…by making such a practice non-economic since non-authorized saved seed will not germinate, and, therefore, would be useless for planting.’ D&PL calls the thousand-year-old tradition of farmer-saved seed by the pejorative term, ‘brown bagging’ as though it is something dirty and corrupt.
Translated into lay language, D&PL officially declares the purpose of its Patent No. 5,723,765, Control of Plant Gene Expression, is to prevent farmers who once get trapped into buying transgenic or GMO seeds from a company such as Monsanto or Syngenta, from ‘brown bagging’ or being able to break free of control of their future crops by Monsanto and friends. As D&PL puts it, their patent gives them ‘the prospect of opening significant worldwide seed markets to the sale of transgenic technology in varietal crops in which crop seed currently is saved and used in subsequent seasons as planting seed.’ 
Instead, the farmer or the country whose farmers depend on Monsanto patented GMO seeds must pay a license fee to Monsanto each year to get new seeds. ‘


Terminator is the answer to the agribusiness dream of controlling world food production. No longer would they need to hire expensive detectives to spy on whether farmers were re-using Monsanto or other GMO patented seed. Terminator corn or soybeans or cotton seeds could be genetically modified to ‘commit suicide’ after one harvest season. That would automatically prevent farmers from saving and re-using the seed for the next harvest. The technology would be a means of enforcing Monsanto or other GMO patent rights, and forcing payment of farmer use fees not only in developing economies, where patent rights were, understandably, little respected, but also in industrial OECD countries.
With Terminator patent rights, once a country such as Argentina or Brazil or Iraq or the USA or Canada opened its doors to the spread of GMO patented seeds among its farmers, their food security would be potentially hostage to a private multinational company, a company which, for whatever reasons, especially given its intimate ties to the US Government, might decide to use ‘food as a weapon’ to compel a US-friendly policy from that country or group of countries. 
Sound far-fetched? Go back to what then-Secretary of State Henry Kissinger did in countries like Allende’s Chile to force a regime change to a ‘US-friendly’ Pinochet dictatorship by withholding USAID and private food exports to Chile. Kissinger dubbed it ‘food as a weapon.’ Terminator is merely the logical next step in food weapon technology. 
The role of the US Government in backing and financing Delta & Pine Land’s decades of Terminator research is even more revealing. As Kissinger said back in the 1970’s, ‘Control the oil and you can control entire Continents. Control food and you control people…’ 




Mould, slime found at Listeria-stricken meat plant weeks after heavy cleaning: reports






In wake of attack, military asks: Who cares for the caregivers?
The Geopolitics behind the phoney US war in Afghanistan





Another Outspoken Kyrgyz Journalist Attacked

Financial Sense Online Editorials

11/06 Finance’s Euphoria: The Epilogue by Elliott Wave
11/06 Market Is Strong, But Correction Should Continue by Carl Swenlin
11/06 Battle of the Titans by Andrew McKillop
11/06 Gold at both ends of the economic K Wave by Clif Droke
11/06 The Past Decade by David Morgan
11/06 Will Russia really sell gold in the ‘open market’ or will it keep buying? by Julian Phillips
11/06 Thucydides in the Underworld by J. R. Nyquist
11/05 See for Yourself: This S&P 500 Chart Tells the Two-Part Truth by Elliott Wave
11/05 Team Obama Versus the Primary Trend by Ghassan Abdallah, Ph.D.
11/04 Why Gold Has a LONG Way to Go by Jeff Clark
11/04 Rock’n in the Bakken by Bill Powers
11/03 The Nanny State by James Quinn
11/03 Agri-Food Thoughts by Ned Schmidt
11/03 This Week: Nailed It? Probably by Peter Navarro, Ph.D.
11/02 Th*nk*ng (Accelerations) by Fred Cederholm
11/02 Are China Bulls Being Prepared For Slaughter? by Clif Droke
10/30 Six-Month Favorable Seasonality Period Beginning by Carl Swenlin
10/30 Black Monday: Ancient History Or Imminent Future? by Elliott Wave
10/30 Forgotten Anniversary - One Hundred Years of Legal Tender by Antal Fekete
10/30 The Executive Branch and the Roots of Order by J. R. Nyquist


NASA-funded monkey-radiation experiment raises hackles

The PCRM sees little benefit to humankind in an environment where lofty spaceflight goals are banging against harsh economic and political realities. "Interplanetary human travel is, at best, a highly speculative aim for the foreseeable future," the organization's appeal states. "To put animals through radiation tests now in anticipation of such an enterprise is in no way justified."



Oil spill contaminates N.S. river


About 600 litres of pink furnace oil spilled out of an outdoor tank located behind a strip mall at 1053 Sackville Dr. in Lower Sackville, Halifax RCMP Cpl. Joe Taplin said.
It appears the copper line to the tank was deliberately cut.


No comments:

Post a Comment