Fair Use Note

WARNING for European visitors: European Union laws require you to give European Union visitors information about cookies used on your blog. In many cases, these laws also require you to obtain consent. As a courtesy, we have added a notice on your blog to explain Google's use of certain Blogger and Google cookies, including use of Google Analytics and AdSense cookies. You are responsible for confirming this notice actually works for your blog, and that it displays. If you employ other cookies, for example by adding third party features, this notice may not work for you. Learn more about this notice and your responsibilities.

Thomas Paine

To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead.

Sunday, July 12, 2009

Indian Water Woes

Bottling livelihoods

Dropping ground water levels and gross soil pollution in Varanasi district, UttarPradesh, prompt a fresh crop of protest actions against Coca-Cola. For its part the corporation attempts to resolve the conflict by ‘educating’ its critics, and issuing tenuous claims against evidence of environmental degradation.

Flash floods: Misery imposed by men, not nature

One early morning on February 6th even as bureaucrats of Social Justice and Empowerment Ministry rushed to their office, men and women from Narmada valley had arrived to knock the gates of the ministry. Since the deadline to rehabilitate them (December 31, if the dam builders wished to raise the dam height before monsoon 2006) had passed by, the oustees were visibly angry and sought an explanation why the ministry responsible for keeping an oversight on rehabilitation progress actively encouraged the false Action Taken Reports, reportedly being sent to it by Narmada Valley Development Authority and Narmada Control Authority

They returned to their villages only to recollect a month later that the dam building corporation and state governments backing it were acting surreptitiously to manage the clearance to raise the Sardar Sarovar dam’s height to 121.92 mts. 

 These disciplined people were routinely dragged, beaten and detained by those who supposedly keep the law and order in place

Narmada debate has entered a decisive phase and the onset of monsoon will tell which way will people go: embracing the watery graves brought in with submergence without rehabilitation – which is almost imminent and can’t be undone by the patchwork of rehabilitation oversight within a month – or resorting to the option of armed resistance.

The Supreme Court gave an order on the petition by oustees. The order upheld the contention of the petitioners that the rehabilitation process was reduced to a game of numbers (hyperlink article http://www.indiatogether.org/2005/apr/hrt-dampafs.htm) where the number of affected families was constantly in flux. MP government had maneuvered to diminish the number of affected persons by introducing an arbitrary distinction of permanent and temporary submergence. I had called this process “forced disappearance”, whereby the best way to rehabilitate displaced persons turned out to be a three-stage process, without venturing into submergence village at any stage.

These three stages were:
To make a list, 
Then take thousands of people off the list,
Show that those to be rehabilitated have been granted cash compensation cheques by post.

September 2006: Update from the author
What makes submergence, water logging and flash floods so different from floods? A simple pointer that while the former results from ill-advised decisions taken by individuals, who remain shielded by a system that is shrouded under the culture of secrecy, the latter has been a natural phenomenon just like rainfall or a river is. 

The debate is slowly raging that this year's flash floods flowed out of negligent dam operations, and not from incessant rainfall within a matter of few days or rivers rising suddenly and flowing in spate. A look back at similar incidents and media's role in past few years indicate that how easily it debunked critical thinking and chose to flow with official viewpoint; unless it came to a hugely populated city going under waters due to flash floods in Tapti river downstream of Ukai dam.
So a monsoon later, how effectively and optimally have dam operators in Gujarat utilized the impounded water in reservoir over Narmada? It was widely reported in Gujarati newspapers that Narmada Main Canal was breached at several places and since July 28th it was carrying meager 580 cubic feet water per second, even as the inflow of water at Sardar Sarovar dam was 23000 cubic feet per second. As meager flow into irrigation canals along with incessant rains upstream led to sudden rise of water levels, releases into the river through the powerhouse were just 21,000 cusecs till the dam started overflowing from August 2nd onwards. Far from taking impounded waters to other rivers through irrigation canal, Gujarat couldn't utilize the waters impounded in the reservoir, taking the water level to a high 128 meters within a matter of a week spelling doom for downstream villages and Bharuch.

Rewind one more year. Two years ago, on August 3rd 2004, UNI reported that Narmada main canal collapsed at two places near Bodeli, inundating villages and rendering hundreds of villagers homeless. Within a week, on August 11th, PTI Bhasha had flashed similar news, reporting of collapse of Narmada canal in Viramgam Taluka in Ahmedabad district.

Neither of the incidents of collapse of main canal was followed with incisive and analytical follow up by mainstream media. During past two years ad hoc administration of irrigation establishment didn't come under public gaze, as media actively overflowed along with official view. Those who tried to battle against silencing of untold miseries suffered by people due to water logging, submergence and flash floods downstream were belittled by them. An overflowing dam that attracted thousands to behold it in awe didn't allow any questions on what havoc did it spell on submergence affected people, or what untold misery can it spell for people living downstream?

So the pertinent question is, why did Surat got submerged, with the backlash of high tide raising the backwater level alike the rising waters in submergence zone of dams?

Just prior to the onset of this year's monsoon, water level in Ukai dam was 21.56 % of the reservoir capacity, and by July 20th it was already 51 % (i.e. half) filled, as per Central Water Commission data.

Within next ten days, water level at dam site rose and on July 30th it stood at 322.93 feet, which is around 22 feet below the Full Reservoir Level, as per an UNI news release. The same news release had quoted floods control room sources at Surat claiming that Tapti river was flowing six meters below danger mark, clearly indicating that even as the reservoir was filing up very fast, authorities had not scheduled downstream releases in a phased manner!

While four days later, on August 3rd, reservoir was filled to 77.54% of the storage capacity, the irrigation minister was heard pressing at a press briefing on August 2nd, "till August 15th waters will not be released from Ukai dam", as revealed now by IANS correspondent. Authorities waited for three more days before hitting the panic button by hastily opening the floodgates of Ukai on August 6th, the waters started steadily rising in Tapti river downstream. Next day, by the afternoon water level in 345.6 feet high Ukai dam had risen up to 341 feet and they started releasing 7 to 8 lakh cusecs waters downstream as per news agency reports. By the night, the downstream releases went up to 10 lakh cusecs. By this time large part of Surat had already submerged under water, but on August 8th as well, dam authorities continued releasing 10 lakh cusecs water, while authorities bluffed misleading certain news agencies that "now it had decided to allow water levels to go up to 344.8 feet". On August 9th, the volume of waters release form Ukai dam had come down to 7.50 lakh cusecs, however, there was no respite for Surat, as it coincided with high tide in the sea on full moon day, not allowing the waters to recede.

And while the meager amount of statistics that are available from various news agency reports and UNDP's situation reports make out a strong case pointing a finger at negligent dam operation by Ukai dam authorities, in a statement published by The Indian Express on August 13th, S R Rao, Principal Secretary, Urban Development chose to give a clean chit to Ukai authorities; "I have checked all statistics. None including you could have prevented this" (emphasis supplied).

On August 11th, the same newspaper had carried a news story titled Don't fault nature, Surat's misery man made, in which N K Singh reported, "Gujarat government has been reluctant to disclose official data related to inflow and outflow of water. Revenue Minister Kaushik Patel refused to share the details at a press meet in Gandhinagar and walked out in a huff when media persons quizzed him on the releases of water."

Himanshu Thakkar, director of South Asia Network on Dams, Rivers and People says, "The trouble is, so long as our water bureaucracy remains non-transparent and unaccountable, disasters like the current one won't leave us soon. The least one can demand is a credible, independent enquiry on why such a situation arose. Especially when it was one that could have been substantially avoided with more optimal operation of projects."

No comments:

Post a Comment