Fair Use Note

WARNING for European visitors: European Union laws require you to give European Union visitors information about cookies used on your blog. In many cases, these laws also require you to obtain consent. As a courtesy, we have added a notice on your blog to explain Google's use of certain Blogger and Google cookies, including use of Google Analytics and AdSense cookies. You are responsible for confirming this notice actually works for your blog, and that it displays. If you employ other cookies, for example by adding third party features, this notice may not work for you. Learn more about this notice and your responsibilities.

Thomas Paine

To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead.

Sunday, July 8, 2012

8 July - Energy Politics and Fuel Security

Climate changeClimate change (Photo credit: jeancliclac)Campaign against Climate Change LogoCampaign against Climate Change Logo (Photo credit: Wikipedia)Britain - spy nationBritain - spy nation (Photo credit: Clive Power)

 uk column

"I don't believe they would do it!"
How many times have we heard that from people who cannot suspend their disbelief long enough to look objectively at the possibility that the New World Order is indeed a very nasty global conspiracy run by the monied elites?
Rather than attempt to persuade the reader that such evil exists, I'm going to let Bertrand Russell do it for me.


Although researchers attempt to include as many processes as possible, simplifications of the actual climate system are inevitable because of the constraints of available computer power and limitations in knowledge of the climate system. Results from models can also vary due to different greenhouse gas inputs and the model's climate sensitivity.

Not all effects of global warming are accurately predicted by the climate models used by the IPCC.

In order to limit warming to within the lower range described in the IPCC's "Summary Report for Policymakers"[137] it will be necessary to adopt policies that will limit greenhouse gas emissions to one of several significantly different scenarios described in the full report.[138] This will become more and more difficult with each year of increasing volumes of emissions and even more drastic measures will be required in later years to stabilize a desired atmospheric concentration of greenhouse gases. Energy-related carbon-dioxide (CO2) emissions in 2010 were the highest in history, breaking the prior record set in 2008.

The examples and perspective in this section deal primarily with English-speaking territories and do not represent a worldwide view of the subject

Trying to introduce [certain contrary viewpoints] into an AGW article in Wikipedia is ... his supporters appeared with more evidence and arguments in favour ...

How the markets will do more harm than good

Here are a few of examples of how a market based system will do more harm than good for eliminating pollution.

1. Harmful energy price volatility

2. Few greenhouse gas reductions

3. Raises energy price for consumers

4. Creates billions in windfall profits for utility owners

5. Even economist that thought of cap and trade dont believe it to be an appropriate tool to reduce greenhouse emmissions.

6. Carbon offsets (credits) viewed as an intergrity destroying add on that was not part of the acid rain program in the US.

7. Carbon offsets (credits) have the potential to increase greenhouse gas emmissions rather than lowering them, because simply by purchasing them means that you can burn more fossils fuels than would otherwise been allowed in the cap and trade system with no credits.

8. At the 5.24 mark of the video they explain how the production of a particular refrigerant in Europe which has an extremely powerful greenhouse gas as a by-product is in-expensive and easy to capture and destroy, yet because investors were hell bent on selling its detsruction (by-product) as a carbon offset to make a profit they would not allow manufactureres to destroy this by product, this is because it was twice as profitable to sell the destruction of the by-product as it was to sell the refrigerant itself.

9. The cap and trade on acid rain that bugs keeps telling us has worked in the US is not because of the market based system it was based on BUT rather because of easy tweaks to existing infrastructure, ie. the use of lower sulphur coal and gas scrubbers in the powerstations, involving little new infrastructure and no inovation to change to clean energy.
And they started to produce excess refrigerant to make profit on the detruction of the by-product, in the mean time all this by-product is being released into the atmosphere.

Now all you crazies that believe in a market based system - GO FIGURE THAT ONE FFS.

Anyway there's lots more if you care to look.

Both these people work as attorneys at the US environmental protection agency and oth have over 20 years experience each.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BA-QufQzuWU"]The Huge Mistake Climate Change Solutions 2009 - YouTube[/ame]
Last edited by dumbanddumber; 03-17-2012 at 08:31 PM.


Irish Court Rules Against Mothers Right To Refuse Vaccination

One Step Closer To Nuclear Fusion

Jonathan Graves and his colleagues at the Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne in Switzerland, were able to quench the instabilities in the gas plasma as soon as they appeared, by adjusting an antenna which emitted strong electromagnetic radiation. Their approach doesn't add any physical complexity to the reactor because the antennae used to quench the instabilities are the same antennae used to heat the plasma in the first place.
The team tested their solution on the Joint European Torus, the largest reactor currently in use.


Wikipedia, the notorious online encyclopedia, which features the likes of Chip Berlet among its "editors," has been caught in the center of the climategate swindle. According to a report by Lawrence Solomon published in the National Post of Canada, a Wikipedia editor and UK Green Party activist named William Connolley, doctored literally thousands of entries, to conceal the fact that, during the Medieval period, there was a global warming spell, following the Little Ice Age.

Climate Change Alarmism: - A Common Purpose Of The Political Elite?

Huhne says yes to £22 Billion green tax: Petrol could soar under LibDem Minister's Drive.  Additional media reports in advance of, and during, the Climate Change Conference in Cancun, Mexico have included:

This style of sensationalist reporting is unlikely to move a highly sceptical British Public especially when considered alongside new revelations that 'Climate policy has almost nothing to do anymore with climate protection ... The next world climate summit in Cancun is actually an economy summit during which the distribution of the world's resources will be negotiated'. IPCC official: Climate policy is redistributing the worlds wealth.
If the United Nations Climate Change and Sustainable Development Agendas really are for the communist style principles of wealth redistribution readers might find the following information concerning certain individuals and their 'Common Purpose' activities of particular interest.

President Obama & Common Purpose

On pages 2 & 15 of the United States 09 Copenhagen document  Our Common Purpose: Addressing Climate Change President Barack Obama is quoted as saying
'If we are flexible and pragmatic, if we can resolve to work tirelessly in common effort, then we will achieve our common purpose: a world that is safer, cleaner, and healthier than the one we found; and a future that is worthy of our children......We are optimistic that the world will succeed in our common purpose, but there is much work to do. The United States is seeking nothing less that the transformation of the World's energy systems, and it will require a massive effort.  -
The 700 page Stern Review on the economics of climate change provides prescriptions for environmental taxes.
the New York Times published When Carbon is Currency by Hannah Fairfield. She wrote
'To build a carbon market, its originators must create a currency of carbon credits that participants can trade'.
Further evidence of the thinking of the globalists came in a November 2009 Telegraph Article Everyone in Britain could be given a personal carbon allowance. The article stated that
'....implementing individual carbon allowances for every person will be the most effective way of meeting the targets for cutting greenhouse gas emissions. It would involve people being iussued with a unique number which they would hand over when purchasing products that contribute to their carbon fottprint, such as fuel, airline tickets and electricity. Like with a bank account, a statement would bge sent out each month to help people keep track of what they are using. If their "carbon account" hits zero they would have to buy more credits'.
( Just the consideration one needs during a cold snap ) 

Despite Cancun being the second Climate Change Conference in a row in which no new binding Treaty Obligations were agreed it was also reported that 'Chris Huhne, the Energy Change Secretary, signalled that he would unilaterally raise Britain's emissions reductions target'.
What this effectively means for those on low, modest and fixed incomes is a further reduction in living standards due to the regressive nature of environmental taxes that are applied to drive fuel consumption downwards. With the Telegraph reporting in December 2010 that  Britain could be heading for its coldest winter in 300 years, many UK residents will be praying that Huhne's words in Cancun turn out to be as meaningless as his parties pre-election pledge not to raise University tuition fees.
Additionally, with more than 1,000 International scientists now challenging the man made global warming claims made by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and former Vice President Al Gore, it is difficult not to believe that Huhne's actions have been shaped more by common purpose than by common sense.

Dispatches Psyop

"fuel poverty" can be defined as either:
The state of having to spend more than 10% of disposable income to keep your fleet of private jets running. Cost-cutting measures on imported Cuban cigars and vintage Cognac may be necessary.
- or -
The state of having to spend more than 10% of disposable income on heating so that you don't die of hypothermia. Cost-cutting measures such as eating left-over cat food may be necessary.

Dispatches solution to high energy prices was not, as you might think, to vilify the energy companies for giving away 40% of our energy bills to shareholders as dividends. No, no, no. Although this was mentioned in passing, the main thrust was that the energy companies should hang their heads in shame for living in the twentieth century. Here in the twenty-first century, all homes should have a "smart meter."
With a smart meter, all our problems go away. We can fight off the hypotheria with the warm glow we get from knowing that our energy usage is being monitored at all times and that data is sent back to the energy company at half hourly intervals.

The Excellent Powder: DDT's Political And Scientific History is the title of a long awaited book by Dr. Donald Roberts, entomologist whose malaria research determined that the pesticide DDT works chiefly by repelling mosquitoes, which was launched at a Washington DC press conference on the 21st April.

Cameron's Franco British Defence Pact Undermines UK's Independent Strategic Nuclear Defence Capability

European sources have previously indicated that Britain is to be stripped of nuclear weapons, leaving European inter-continental nuclear defence capability in the hands of the French

Happy for British troops to die in unlawful wars Iraq and Afghanistan, Cameron has consistently cut defence spending and capability behind their backs, without any dialogue within parliament.
The UK Column revealed in early 2011 that Cameron’s 50 year defence pact with the French was hatched behind closed doors with the Franco British Council - a charity supposedly set up to foster good relations between Britain and France.
Franco-British Defence Cooperation was discussed in secret meetings co-chaired by Baroness Taylor former UK minister for defence equipment and Xavier Pintat Senator of the French Defence Committee.
No minutes were produced for the meetings, held within the Franco British Council in Paris.
It is also significant that the secret talks were ahead of the UK’s Strategic Defence Review, which slashed British defence capability, and were also ahead of Camerons 50 year defence treaty.
Under the treaty, Britain is currently reduced to sharing French aircraft carriers, since Royal Navy carriers have been scrapped by the Conservative government.
Joint submarine operations meanwhile, have resulted in a underwater collision between the ballistic nuclear submarines HMS Vanguard and Le Triomphant in 2009.
Concerned military sources report that French penetration of UK military command, control and communications is already causing dangerous disruption to operations at strategic and local level.

Ministry Of Defence Next To Be Privatised

Russia Resists Pressure To Back British Doctrine Of Regime Change

Russians Highlight Obama's Adoption of Cheney's "Prompt Global Strike" Strategy

At 0930 this morning, in scenes reminiscent of Stasi East Germany, 2 police cars and 4 policemen from Merseyside Police arrested British Constitution Group Chairman Roger Hayes at his Wirral home and drove away.

The government has once again refused to publish the official assessment of the risks involved in the government's NHS shakeup, contrary to Law.

Would you, as a right thinking honourable soul, with a conscience and integrity – or even half a brain – build a monument to someone who had deliberately misled almost a whole nation?

Enhanced by Zemanta

No comments:

Post a Comment