24 April - NWO assaults

Image by Rooey202 via Flickr

 Silent Weapons for a Quiet War
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/silentweaponsforquietwars.htm

FOOD: Weapon of the Class War
http://theintelhub.com/2011/04/20/food-weapon-of-the-class-war
Former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger declared in the 1970’s,

‘If you control the oil you control the nations; if you control food, you control the population.

Catherine Bertini, Executive director U.N. World Food Program, in 1995 said:

Food is Power. We use it to change behavior. Some may call that bribery. We do not apologize.

Image via Wikipedia

All creatures from the tiniest bacterium to the largest mammal need healthy, nutritious food to survive.  Earth Mother developed infinite varieties of foods, yet much of the world goes hungry.
We suffer and die from food diseases such as obesity, diabetes, and cancers.  We have it in our power to help-or rather end- the situation but we do not.  Instead the wealthiest among us are too much in control of what we produce.  Corporations patent seeds making the saving of seeds difficult at best.

A weed is just a plant whose virtues have not yet been discovered.  Ralph Waldo Emerson

To kill those pesky plants, weeds, we pollute with chemical–mostly oil based– pesticides(generic term) like there will be no tomorrow. We are destroying the land, water, and air with toxic substances.  Farmers are under the thumb of big ag and either cannot see the evil they are complicit in or else they find it impossible to change course.
They grow commodity crops that make the rich richer while doing little to increase nutrition or real-food availability.

Image by USAID_IMAGES via Flickr

• Color Revolution’s Mystery Gunmen
• Japan Nuclear Radiation Rainwater Update – Idaho Iodine Levels 14,066% Above EPA Limit
• Dr. Mark Sircus: Radioactive Currents and Winds
• Top Government Vaccine Researcher Indicted For Fraud, Austism Research Now In Question
• 1 Simple Question Regarding Obama
• Las Vegas Police Break Man’s Nose For Video Taping Them
• TSA VIPR Squads Invade Florida Train Stations, Full Scale Takeover of America
• Two Different Stories Told on Safety of Local Radioactivity
• Agent Provocateurs? Anarchists Vandalize Bank In Seattle’s Capitol Hill Neighborhood While Banks Loot Middle Class

Managing the Food Weapon
http://www.arrforum.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=106&Itemid=199

At a press conference on 28th April, 2008, t h e UN Secretary General officially announced that food is a new war weapon against the poor of the post-Cold War global economy. His solution of US$ 750 million for purchasing fertiliser and seeds was clearly meant to butter hearts of multinationals that control seeds and manufacture fertilisers. Seeds that are genetically programmed to give high yields only if fed with chemical fertilisers are roads to disaster for poor farmers that cannot afford adequate levels of fertilisers.

Such seeds also require constant supply of water that rain may not guarantee, but need to be hooked to irrigation. Such irrigation demands appropriate equipment that are manufactured and supplied by these corporations and are, therefore, another set of financial burdens on poor farmers.
.....

The World Health Organisation (WHO) and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) have been very active in recommending what scientists regard as adequate levels of nutrition to be ingested by individuals. In Nigeria, the National Agency for Food, Drug Administration Control (NAFDAC) has come close to dealing with this issue, but has tended to stop at dangers of foods likely to contain poisons from bad processing.

Nutrition scientists show deep concern about dangers resulting from inadequate levels of nutrients in foods taken or not taken. They have established a number of alarms, such as the following: low or lack of vitamin A causes blindness; and, bones get deformed when vitamin D is lacking, which may result in rickety legs or pelvic defects that would prevent normal births in women. It was shocking to see a recent exposure of a pandemic of rickets in a community in Kaduna State that had only gotten attention because a team of German scientists had taken interest in it.

Food that is low in protein, vitamins and enzymes may hinder mental development in children as well as lower their ability to learn. President Thabo Mbeki of South Africa drew a brutal battle with those advocating sale of HIV/AIDS drugs when he insisted that poor diet is the primary destroyer of immunity to infections. What is of prime interest here is the need for a national map of food intakes and of health problems resulting from areas of food poverty.

Human beings also have to compete for their food with other organisms, which include bacteria, moulds, insects, rodents, birds and yeasts. Traditional defences against the competition that the communities and laboratory scientists had invented included denying entry to insects; trapping or harrassing away birds (either in swarms or in limited numbers); removing moisture through drying or smoking; excluding oxygen; and reducing activity by enzymes inside the food items. These measures combine well to keep the foods wholesome and to keep toxins (such as aflatoxins found in poorly dried millet and groundnuts) and other micro-organisms away hence preventing illness to humans.

While the above problem of preservation receives sporadic attention, some areas like fighting quelea birds enjoy dramatic visibility when financial interest are involved (in hiring light planes to spray chemicals) as swarms come into focus. Consider the deaths that arise from eating beans sprayed with chemicals to keep away weevils, or oranges and tomatoes that rot away before reaching consumers; interest in such matters fade away quickly as media attention wanes.

The high occurrence of liver cancer as a result of eating grains invaded by aflatoxins continues to be ignored as a policy challenge by officials of the relevant Ministries of Agriculture and Health. There is also no vigorous promotion of investment in food production within a larger industrial agenda that sees African producers as key players in local, African and global markets.

More formidable threats to food security have been in the areas of policy propaganda. Three of the policies stand out. One is the loud advocacy of ‘green revolution’ seeds that ignore, and even destroy, local seeds that have centuries of ecological adaptability. These seeds are genetically engineered by scientists working for big multinational companies. Imposing them on African farmers creates a dangerous dependency, as they are programmed to become sterile when harvested. In effect, farmers get significantly lower yields if they use these seeds in a subsequent season.

The danger of the post-Cold War era, assuming the Malthusian notions of the “survival of the fittest”, is very real. Its dawn was marked by the emergence of HIV and AIDS as a weapon with origins in biotechnological experiments. Its commercial value is now expressed in the provision of steady markets for pharmaceutical companies that produce anti retroviral drugs. The use of genetically modified seeds as a possible war weapon (through the destruction of internal food security of mass peasant communities), needs open discourse and diplomatic work and thought. Africa cannot afford to remain silent now that food war has burst into the open.

Sowing The Seeds Of Insecurity -
The Future Of Our Food Supply
http://www.care2.com/c2c/share/detail/935929
An ill-wind blew across Percy Schmeiser's land in 1996. Today in his 70s, the third-generation Saskatchewan, Canada, farmer has been growing and improving his own canola (oil seed) crops for 40 years. Each year, he would save some of his harvested seed for planting the following year. Though some farmers in the surrounding area were growing Monsanto's patented, genetically modified (GM) Roundup Ready canola, Schmeiser was not. He was growing his own, but the wind blew and bees flew, both apparently carrying grains of GM pollen from neighboring fields into Schmeiser's crop. Or maybe it was GM seed transported from surrounding farms that often blew off trucks traveling the roads adjacent to Schmeiser's land. No matter. Without his knowledge or consent, errant, patented Monsanto genes had apparently been incorporated into some of the Schmeiser family's 1997-harvested canola seed. In 1998, the farmer planted over a thousand acres of his land with the seed he had saved from the previous year's crop. A hired Monsanto investigator analyzed samples of canola plants taken from Percy Schmeiser's land, and the company found evidence of its patented genes in the plant tissue. When Schmeiser refused to pay Monsanto fees for use of its patented herbicide resistance technology, technology he neither bought nor wanted, Monsanto sued him. According to a report on the trial ( Monsanto vs. Percy Schmeiser was heard in a Canadian court June 5 - 20, 2000. According to reports, Monsanto never directly tried to explain how their genes got into Schmeiser's field. In fact, the Western Producer, a Canadian agriculture magazine, quoted Monsanto attorney, Roger Hughes, as saying, "Whether Mr. Schmeiser knew of the matter or not matters not at all." In other words, Schmeiser's fields were contaminated by Monsanto's GM technology, and it didn't matter if Schmeiser was aware of the contamination or not. They were going to make him pay for it! Percy Schmeiser said, "It was a very frightening thing because they said it does not matter how it gets into a farmer's field; it's their property.......if I would go to St. Louis (Monsanto headquarters) and contaminate their plots--destroy what they have worked on for 40 years--I think I would be put in jail and the key thrown away." On March 29, 2001, nearly three years since the contaminated canola was discovered in Schmeiser's field, Canadian Judge W. Andrew MacKay agreed with Monsanto that it did not matter how its genes got onto Percy Schmeiser's fields; the farmer was still guilty of having them without having paid for the privilege. (You can read the entire decision at http://www.fct-cf.gc.ca ). Sadly, as part of the damages, the farmer also lost 40 years of work improving his own canola seed line, as his crop was confiscated.

Aids as a Weapon of War
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/aidsplot.htm

 ........There had to be some sort of simultaneous seeding process.

The only worldwide simultaneous seeding going on at the same time was the smallpox vaccine program of the World Health Organization (the WHO).

The early epidemiology of the AIDS pandemic fits the smallpox vaccination project of the WHO -- AND NOTHING ELSE -- with the exception of the U.S., which we will examine subsequently.)

The AIDS virus was created in a laboratory by combining lethal animal "retroviruses" in human cancer (HeLA) cell cultures. These viruses have never before caused infection in man.

The "species barrier" has always been nature's way of keeping a deadly virus from wiping out the entire animal kingdom, including man. The myxoma virus of rabbits, for example, wiped out the rabbit population of Europe, but man and other animals were not affected.

The sheep visna virus completely decimated the flocks of Iceland, but no other animal was affected.

The virologists deny that the AIDS virus, HIV-1, is of animal origin. I am sure that you see the paradox here. Aren't monkeys animals?

They are also united in saying that it's not possible for the virus to have been engineered in a laboratory. If it didn't come from other animals and it didn't come from a laboratory, and they now admit privately that the monkey couldn't have done it, then it must have come out of thin air. That's a theological position and hence beyond argument. It's certainly not scientific.

These scientists who have created this monstrous problem in their sorcerer's retrovirology laboratories are constantly caught in their own lies.

New documentary investigates war being waged by biotechnology companies against scientists who expose the truth about GMOs
http://www.naturalnews.com/032110_scientists_GMOs.html

 In order to maintain its massive charade of deception in claiming that genetically-modified organisms (GMOs) are the safe, practical solution to the world's food problems, the biotechnology industry has had to silence and destroy the lives of many in the scientific community. In the hard-hitting new documentary Scientists Under Attack - Genetic Engineering in the Magnetic Field of Money, German filmmaker Bertram Verhaag explores the heavy hand of the biotechnology industry in steering "science" towards its own interests, and eliminating the actual, legitimate science that exposes genetic engineering (GE) as the fraud that it is.

In the film, Verhaag speaks to various experts in the industry, including two scientists in particular whose lives have been ruined as a result of their inquiry into GE. Going against the flow, Arpad Pusztai and Ignacio Chapela questioned the "science" being peddled by the likes of Monsanto about GE, and instead sought to discover the real truth. In the process, they both ended up being threatened by the biotechnology industry and essentially losing their careers.

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/032110_scientists_GMOs.html#ixzz1KTCvvqNc

• Using police to enforce a Big Pharma medication agenda is a violation of civil rights (and a waste of good cops)
• Japanese government censors Fukushima reports that contradict official story
• Cap The Gene Spill - New video says GMO contamination of world is far worse than Gulf of Mexico oil spill
• Natural remedies help intestinal gas and bloating
• Conquer Candida naturally
• Eight reasons to try a pressure cooker
• Nuclear weather worsens
• Cultural, spiritual causes of Fukushima disaster explained in new downloadable report from NaturalNews
• Monsanto wants to start testing GM wheat
• Blue Hill becomes third town in Maine to pass food freedom law
• A perfect storm gathers over the discussion on radiation and flying
• Protect your family from radiation exposure with superfoods
• Fukushima radiation taints US milk supplies at levels 300% higher than EPA maximums
• Radiation exposure chart admits cancer radiotherapy delivers fatal dose to patients
• Permaculture shows us the path to a backyard revolution
• Three new studies reveal children are dumbed down by pesticide exposure in womb
• Effective cancer prevention suggestions the cancer industry ignores
• Simple strategies to boost and maintain your pH levels
• Thirty-six predictions for the world: 2010 - 2012
• Drug injection delays puberty
• Survey: Many women shoppers avoid OTC drugs, seek natural alternatives
• Woman lived with pair of eight-inch scissors in stomach for three years following surgical error
• Discovery by Israeli scientists may lead to development of 'green' pesticides
• Discover the health benefits of licorice
• Natural remedies help intestinal gas and bloating

ClimateGate scandal demonstrates intellectual protectionism of modern scientists

The inconvenient release of private email conversations among climate change scientists has been a boon for climate change skeptics. What emerges from the leaked emails is a depiction of a group of scientists who practice "intellectual protectionism" -- meaning they know they're right and they'll do anything to protect their beliefs, even if it means hiding or manipulating data.

Sound familiar? Scientists in the pharmaceutical industry have been practicing this for decades. If you think the ClimateGate emails are revealing, just imagine what kind of similar emails are flying around between Big Pharma scientists who routinely manipulate study data and commit scientific fraud in the name of medicine. Time and time again, we see revelations of manipulated clinical trials where data was intentionally distorted in order to make a dangerous, useless drug appear to be safe and effective.

What ClimateGate scientists and Big Pharma scientists have in common is that they have both abandoned the core principles of good science in their quest to be right. Rather than asking questions of nature and humbly listening to the answers provided by the data, these scientists have staked out a position and decided to defend that position at all costs -- even if it requires hiding or distorting data!

That approach is entirely unscientific, of course. In my mind, it now puts much of the recent global warming science in the same category as Big Pharma's research: Pure quackery.

As Christopher Booker explains in The Telegraph, "The reason why even the Guardian's George Monbiot has expressed total shock and dismay at the picture revealed by the documents is that their authors are not just any old bunch of academics. Their importance cannot be overestimated. What we are looking at here is the small group of scientists who have for years been more influential in driving the worldwide alarm over global warming than any others, not least through the role they play at the heart of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)." (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/...)

Claiming to save the planet is no excuse for scientific fraud

Global warming may, indeed, be a real phenomenon. But trying to "prove" it by conspiring to manipulate the data in order to be right is absolutely the wrong way to go about studying the issue. In fact, these ClimateGate revelations have soundly discredited much of the global warming scientific community to the point where whatever these people say from now on simply cannot be trusted.

And that's a shame because the question remains: What if the global warming scientists are really right? What if they're right for all the wrong reasons, and they let their egos and their professional pride get in the way of conducting real science, thereby discrediting the very notion they were attempting to prove? That's a possibility we would still do well to consider.

Yet, from their released emails, it's quite clear these scientists were manipulating data to make the "science" fit their beliefs. They weren't focused solely on the real facts; they were interested in forwarding their climate change theories using any means necessary -- including scientific trickery.

What's truly sad about all this -- both in the climate change community and the pharmaceutical community -- is that real science has seemingly been replaced by pseudoscientific quackery. I've known for a long time that you can't trust scientists who work for pharmaceutical companies because they tend to distort their findings to support their employer. Now learning that a similar approach to junk science was apparently pursued by climate change scientists is more than a little disconcerting. It makes me wonder: Are there any honest scientists left anywhere?

The structure of scientific revolutions

It seems that in all realms of science, egos are more important than observational data. Whether you're dealing with astronomy, oceanography, anthropology or biology, every scientist wants to be right, and most will do whatever it takes to defend their proclaimed theories and beliefs. This is why it remains so ridiculously difficult to penetrate the minds of modern doctors with facts about vitamin D and cancer, for example: These "scientific thinkers" have already decided what to believe, and they'll defend those beliefs at all costs, even in the face of strong evidence that contradicts their beliefs.

What I've come to realize in all this is that many of today's scientists aren't scientific thinkers.

.......................

Three questions we need to be asking

In order to know what's truly happening with human-caused climate change, we need to get accurate answers to the following three questions:

Question #1) Are CO2 emissions on the rise? And by how much? (The answer to this is clearly yes. This part isn't being debated.)

Question #2) Will high CO2 levels in the atmosphere cause global warming? If so, what will be the climate effects at different CO2 levels? (This is the part being debated.)

Question #3) What can we do to prevent devastating climate change from occurring? (This is also being heavily debated.)

In my mind, there's no question that what we dump into the air affects the climate in some way, but as I'm not a climate scientist, I must rely on others to determine what levels of carbon dioxide are correlated with observable climate effects (such as a change in atmospheric temperature or lack thereof). What I've learned from the ClimateGate scandal is that I really can't trust these scientists to tell the truth about their findings, and that leaves me in a position of having more questions than ever before.

It won't change my behavior, though. I'll still engage in recycling. I'll continue with my plans to install solar panels to power my house. I'll keep planting trees and growing most of my own food locally. Regardless of who's right about ClimateGate, we all have a responsibility to reduce our footprint on this planet, or we may someday discover some other environmental tsunami rising up to haunt us in ways we may have never imagined.

The ClimateGate scientists may have made complete fools of themselves, but I believe we must still practice ecologically-sound "green living" in our own way, each and every day, to the best of our abilities. In other words, don't let the egos of a small group of scientists distract you from the very real need to protect the future of life on our planet. Reduce your own environmental footprint in ways that you can. Conserve and protect what we have on this planet, and we may yet have a planet left for our children a few generations down the line.

http://www.naturalnews.com/027620_ClimateGate_global_warming.html

Retinal Degeneration: Early Evidence of MSG Toxicity
http://evidenceofmsgtoxicity.blogspot.com

In 1969, Olney demonstrated that treatment with monosodium glutamate causes brain lesions in experimental animals, and that those lesions may be followed by endocrine disorders as the animals approached maturity.  During the 1970s, additional research demonstrated that hydrolyzed protein products (which contain MSG just as monosodium glutamate does) will cause brain lesions and neuroendocrine disorders; and that ingestion of monosodium glutamate by the very young will do the same.

• Subornment - more powerful than science
• Propaganda - more toxic than evidence
• Cancer
• Epidemiologic studies
• Endocrine disruption
  Image via Wikipedia
• Brain damage

Related articles

• Sowing Seeds and Our Future (suzanneyork.wordpress.com)
• Seedbombs are weapon of choice in war against wastelands | Leo Hickman (guardian.co.uk)
• Libya turmoil could hurt regional food security: U.N. (reuters.com)
• Nitrogen is the new Carbon (adamcollyer.wordpress.com)
• Acrylamide ? (2012patriot.wordpress.com)
• Nitrogen footprint warning from European agency (talesfromthelou.wordpress.com)
• Agriculture and nutrition: Hidden hunger (economist.com)
• Agenda 21 & Maurice Strong: "Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn't it our responsibility to bring that about?" (angelbabe43.wordpress.com)