Fair Use Note

WARNING for European visitors: European Union laws require you to give European Union visitors information about cookies used on your blog. In many cases, these laws also require you to obtain consent. As a courtesy, we have added a notice on your blog to explain Google's use of certain Blogger and Google cookies, including use of Google Analytics and AdSense cookies. You are responsible for confirming this notice actually works for your blog, and that it displays. If you employ other cookies, for example by adding third party features, this notice may not work for you. Learn more about this notice and your responsibilities.

Thomas Paine

To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead.

Tuesday, September 29, 2009

29 Morning Scandal Sheet ( Conspiracy Style )

The Curve.Image by pdeee454 via Flickr

The Invisible Opportunity: Hidden Truths Revealed

 ALERT! ALERT! Navy Ships breaking out with Swine Flu after H1N1 vaccinations- Five Turning back from missions

From Bob Chapman’s International Forecaster:
US MARKETS
Data gleaned indirectly from anonymous testimony of Navy wives of the affected crew via the internet radio show A Marine Disquisition <http://www.clipser.com/watch_video/1362067> :
  1. Unnamed US Navy vessel put to sea in April with 347 man crew.
  2. Entire crew was vaccinated with H1N1 Swine Flu vaccine shortly after they put to sea.
  3. Crew sickened so severely that other ships had to respond to render aid.  16 Medical Dr.s put aboard from an unnamed aircraft carrier and other responding vessels.  Total of 50 Navy personnel sent aboard to respond to crisis.
  4. Two of the crew of 347 died – including the Captain of the ship (a Lieutenant Commander) and a Chief Petty Officer.
  5. 50 personnel sent aboard to help are quarantined in Navy hospital in Balboa, Spain after 10 of them caught the flu from the ship’s crew.  Two of the 50 quarantined are in serious condition at last report.
  6. Of the 347 man crew that were vaccinated, 333 contracted the H1N1 flu FROM THE VACCINE.  Two died, as mentioned above, and 331 survived.  Only 14 of the 347 vaccinated sailors did not show any ill effects from the vaccine.
  7. Navy has threatened all the spouses of the ship’s crew to remain silent – claiming all this information is classified.  Some are whistle-blowing and that is where this information is coming from.
  8. On the unnamed aircraft carrier that provided assistance, 415 sailors contracted the swine flu and are currently quarantined onboard.
    PLEASE pass this email along.  The truth is that the swine flu epidemic will be created BY THE VACCINE.  If we don’t take it, there will be no epidemic.  From this one test it’s apparent that the vaccine as tested on that ship’s crew in April is 96% effective at infecting the recipient with swine flu.  Such an infection rate is impossible to achieve by any natural means.  Though it only killed 1% immediately, there is no telling what the long term effects on those injected with the vaccine will be.  See the research on the long term effects of the 1976 swine flu vaccine, and the Gulf War anthrax vaccine programs for more information.
    Also note that mere contact with those that have been vaccinated creates a 20% chance of you contracting the swine flu even if you have not been vaccinated.  Please pass this data along to anyone you care about!
     
  9. Top Posts

Telegraph Co. U.K.

How a rubbish idea could save the planet

THE Massachusetts Institute of Technology is one of my favourite places on the planet. Its sprawling campus runs at a thousand ideas an hour, and it's there that I recently found out an absolute humdinger of an invention. It aims to show that when it comes to throwing stuff away, there's no such thing as "away" .

The project emerged from the SENSEable City Laboratory, run by Carlo Ratti, which harnesses sensors and hand-held electronics to help describe cities in a new way. As urban environments become ever more complicated and interconnected, they present us with new opportunities to study how they work – and to make them better places to live in.

US threatens to escalate operations inside Pakistan  

The US has told Pakistan that it may start launching drone attacks against the Taliban leadership in the city of Quetta in a major escalation of its operations in the country.
By Ben Farmer in Kabul and Javed Siddiq in Islamabad
PubliWashington has long been frustrated at Islamabad's reluctance to target the Afghan Taliban's ruling council, the Quetta Shura, which is accused of directing large parts of the insurgency across the border in Afghanistan.

State department and intelligence officials delivered the ultimatum to Asif Ali Zardari, Pakistan's president, last week as he visited the US for the United Nations' security council sessions and the G20 economic summit.

Related Articles

    *
      Terror plot: Baitullah Mehsud profile
    *
      US considers halting drone attacks on Pakistan
    *
      US in new missile attack on Pakistan territory
    *
      Terrorists launch second wave of 'revenge' attacks in Pakistan
    *
      Women in battle against Taliban in Swat

Pakistan's government has argued the Quetta Shura, led by Mullah Mohammad Omar, does not harm Pakistan. It has said that dealing with other militants such as those in the Swat valley was a higher priority.

But last week Anne Patterson, America's ambassador to Islamabad, told the Daily Telegraph that the offensive in Swat was not targeting the insurgents posing the greatest danger to Nato forces in Afghanistan.

An official at the Pakistani interior ministry told the Daily Telegraph: "The Americans said we have been raising this issue with you time and again. These elements are attacking Nato forces in southern Afghanistan, especially in Helmand. The Americans said 'If you don't take action, we will.'"

Rehman Malik, Pakistan's interior minister, said the US had so far been unable to provide detailed intelligence to target the Quetta Shura. He said: "We need real-time intelligence. The Americans have never told us any location."

US unmanned drone strikes have so far been confined to Pakistan's federally administrated tribal border regions where Islamabad holds little sway. But attacks in or around Quetta, in Baluchistan, would strike deep into the Pakistan government's territory and are likely to cause a huge outcry in the country.

Details of the shift in strategy emerged as Barack Obama, the US president, continued to reconsider his strategy for tackling the growing Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan. Gen James L. Jones, Mr Obama's national security adviser, said no deadline had been set for responding to an urgent request for up to 40,000 new troops from the senior Nato commander in Afghanistan.

Gen Stanley McChrystal made the request after delivering a strategic assessment which labelled the situation serious and deteriorating.

Polls show growing US opposition to the war in Afghanistan and several senior democrats have spoken out against sending more troops. Mr Obama said he was a "sceptical audience" to the request.

Joe Biden, US vice president, has argued that Washington should abandon ambitious military proposals and concentrate on more limited operations against al-Qaeda using drones and special forces.

Robert Gates, US defence secretary, denied a rift between the White House and Pentagon over the troop request and said Gen McChrystal was happy for the strategy to be decided before the troop request was considered. Mr Gates rejected calls to set a timetable for withdrawal from Afghanistan and said failure in Afghanistan "would be a huge setback for the United States".

Separately, the Afghan minister for energy and water has survived an assassination attempt when a car bomb exploded, killing at least four civilians and leaving 17 wounded.

The Taliban claimed responsibility for the attack on Ismail Khan, who is one of Afghanistan's key political figures. The bomb exploded in the north western city of Herat as the former warlord's convoy was passing, leaving twisted wreckage littering the tree-lined road. shed: 5:42PM BST 27 Sep 2009

Iran to let IAEA inspect new nuclear site 'soon'

Iran to give nuclear watchdog timetable for inspecting plant.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk
Ratigan’s Switch From CNBC To MSNBC Explained To Michael Moore
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/ratigans-switch-from-cnbc-to-msnbc-explained-to-michael-moore/
The Huffington Post’s Jason Linkins writes about the exchange, in which Ratigan said he was “somebody who left his job at CNBC in order to pursue politicians because of his frustration and anger at the revelation of a system that was clearly designed, basically, to perpetuate generational theft and then cover it up.”
Linkins thought this revealed more about CNBC than Ratigan’s desire to cover a new subject matter. “It’s interesting to hear Ratigan edge right up to saying that CNBC is institutionally averse to providing any clarity or insight into the way in which financial institutions, aided and abetted by well-lobbied politicians, rogered America,” he writes.
But this line of reasoning, while not discussed on air, is nothing new for Ratigan. When I interviewed him in July about the new show, he echoed the sentiments about looking to cover the financial story in a new way:
When I watched what happened last fall, and when capitalism switched from who has the best ideas to who can bribe the government so we can steal taxpayer money, it made clear I wanted to make a move from a financial bias to a policy bias in journalism.
Panel Nerds: Why You Shouldn’t Post on YouTube
http://www.mediaite.com/online/panel-nerds-why-you-shouldn%e2%80


With a panel titled “Why ‘You’ Shouldn’t Post on YouTube” hosted at the Friars Club, you can’t blame us for expecting a roast to break out. But there were no acerbic send ups of YouTube’s inadequacies, and the back and forth did not follow that route. Instead, the discussion became a rebuttal of the panel’s premise. Why shouldn’t you post on YouTube? We don’t know, because this panel argued — and agreed — that you definitely should be posting your videos on YouTube.

Sam Reich, representing College Humor (who, with 30 million views a month, has the 21st most subscribed channel on the site), led the pro-YouTube charge. Every panelist had some success either putting videos on YouTube or in spotting videos on YouTube to highlight as others’ successes. Why is that success so important for up-and-coming comedians? The panel agreed that if your goal is to get your name and your work out there, YouTube is a great venue. As Reich said, “Your YouTube presence is your business card.” Jon Friedman took it a step further, stating that part of being an entertainer today is about building your brand online and moving up the ladder.

There were a few things on which the panel agreed that YouTube was not the answer, though. The main weakness of posting video on YouTube is the lack of opportunity to monetize your work. Though College Humor made $500,000 on YouTube this past year, the $250 per quarter Alex Zalben is making is much closer to typical. The other group of people who may wish to avoid YouTube is people trying to create cinema or art house fair. YouTube is not the site for that, but sites such as Vimeo may eventually become that place, the panel said.

You can’t yet make money on YouTube but you sure can make “you” on YouTube. If the site is viewed as a place to build a presence, you should follow the advice of the panel, and not its title.

THE EXILED

http://exiledonline.com/sound-beam-weapons-turned-on-americans/Here’s some blowback anyone could have seen coming from 10,000 miles away–or however far Iraq and Georgia are from the USA: those crazy LRAD sound-beam weapons which were used to devastating effect by Georgia’s authoritarian leader to crush massive pro-democracy demonstrations two years ago, have finally made their Big Debut here in America, melting the eardrums of G20 demonstrators in Pittsburgh. Click here to see a video of the LRADs used on protestors in Pittsburgh.

It’s not the first time they’ve been deployed against American citizens: a couple of weeks ago, a controversy erupted in San Diego when the county Sheriff, Bill Gore, secretly deployed LRADs at town hall events held by local Republican congressmen and a Democrat congresswoman. At first Gore told a local reporter that the LRADs were for search and rescue missions, but eventually he owned up that he’d purchased the LRADs from the San Diego maker of the weapons, ATC, for “crowd control purposes.” Gore is the notorious FBI agent who led the horrible Ruby Ridge raid, which, thanks to Gore’s “shoot on sight” orders, resulted in FBI snipers killing the intended suspect’s wife as she held her baby, as well as his son and his dog, but left the intended target, Randy Weaver, alive.
Originally the LRADs, which can cause permanent ear damage, were deployed in hot war zones like Iraq. They worked so well on our enemies that by 2006, Bush’s Air Force Secretary called for turning the weapons on American citizens.

In the meantime, one of Bush’s closest pals, Georgian strongman Mikheil Saakashvili, used the LRADs on pro-democracy demonstrations which he violently crushed in November, 2007 (they’ve since restarted and gained momentum, particularly since Saakashvili’s disastrous war against Russia). You can watch a Russian TV report of the LRADs used on Georgian demostrators here.

Shortly after Saakashvili crushed his pro-democracy protests, the Chinese went on an LRAD shopping spree for its police force, just in case there should be another Tiananmen Square situation. Funny thing is that weapons sales to China are illegal ever since they crushed the Tianenmen Square democracy protests; but by some stroke of luck, LRADs aren’t classified as weapons, and therefore, they can be used on pro-democracy Chinese just as they can be used on pro-democracy demonstrators in Georgia or our own country;.

Now we know what John McCain meant last year when he told Georgia’s leader, “I know I speak for every American when I say to him today, we are all Georgians.” And what a wonderful thing that is.

“DEATH BONDS”: WALL STREET’S SHOCKING NEW PLAN TO REAP BILLIONS OFF DYING AMERICANS

Mark Ames / Class War For Idiots

Now we know why America’s oligarchs are fighting to keep the rest of us stuck in the world’s worst health care system: the more we die, the more billions Wall Street will earn.
Read more...




Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

No comments:

Post a Comment